pm_851204 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Planning Commission Minutes December 4, 1985 Page 4 Matson asked for a more detailed discussion on the berm that would be going south on County Road C and D, and how far south the berm would actually be located. Bassett showed that there is a forty foot area and that the berm runs roughly three and one- half feet. The berm would basically be comprised of a grass lawn with trees. The berm would extend as far as the first entry on the site. Matson asked if the berm could be continued farther to the south. Bassett replied it could be difficult because they would lose a row of parking. Matson asked if landscaping could be done in the area to buffer the residents that didn't get the berm. Bassett replied that yes, that would be possible. Matson asked what would occur in Phase I. Wier stated that it would start with an 80,000 foot building, but they are keeping options open with respect to the phases. Matson asked when the eight story building was scheduled. Wier replied it would be scheduled toward the latter part of the development. Matson asked whether a corporate headquarters could end up being located in the area. Wier replied that it was very possible. Wiski asked how flexible the "footprints" were relating to the buffer for the neighborhood. Wier replied that he understood there would be a final review of the landscape plan, and they would make every effort to meet the Planning Commission's needs. Berry asked about the landscaping, and pointed out that with the Minnesota winters, often pines and evergreens actually present a better visual perception. Wier replied that he agreed, and that they would be willing to consider more evergreen type trees. Matson asked as to whether the signing and lighting, once approved, actually met the codes. Mr. Dahlgren replied that if they conform, signing and lighting is not a problem. If there is a major difference, Woodbridge would have to appear before the Commission once again, requesting a variance. Berry asked who would use the proposed jogging path. Wier replied it was intended for more internal use, but if the public ended up using it, it would not be a problem. In addition, the pathway would meet requirements with respect to sidewalks. DeBenedet asked whether the plans for County Road D called for sidewalks, and who maintains existing commercial pathways. Drown replied that the commercial owners are required to remove snow from the pathways. Wiski asked what type of building materials would be used. Wier replied that primarly brick and glass would be used, but on the office/service structure, block would be used that would coincide with the appearance of the brick. Wiski pointed out there is a policy relating to four-sided buildings. Dahlgren replied that for office/service, the block in the back part adjacent to loading areas is appropriate and wouldn't present a problem.