pm_860108 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes January 8, 1986 Page 2 Wiski asked who owned the adjacent property to the east. Hoffman stated that through a contract for deed, the proposed 85 foot parcel with the home was sold to the Smith's, and the proposed 75 foot lot remains in the ownership of the Hoffmans. Dressler asked what would happen to the kennel that is directly west of the new property line. Mr. Hoffman pointed out that he wasn't sure there was anything he could do about structures on the neighbor's property. Pat Smith, the owner the aerial map shows know where it goes. in the area, and the adjacent lot. of the aforementioned 85 foot lot, stated water coming through the lot, and wanted to Honchell replied that storm drainage is now only water on the lot now would be from the Smith asked what would happen to drainage after a building is put on the property. Honchell replied that one cannot change the flow of water even after a home is built. Mr. Hoffman stated it would not be difficult, once the home was built, to be sure that the water flowed into the street. Honchell replied that would certainly be acceptable. Recommendation Berry moved, seconded by Johnson, that the Hoffman request for division of platted lot at 2228 North Rosewood Lane be approved. Discussion Dressler asked about the shed that was on the adjacent property line, and pointed out her concerns regarding that particular structure. Honchell stated that the shed is illegal now, and that the location of the shed by adjacent property owners should not impact the decision on the issue before the Planning Commission. DeBenedet stated he was not comfortable with creating substandard lots. However, he stated with the right home placed on the lot, it could work out, particularly if the neighbors were supportive of the project, he could support it with some reservations. Berry agreed with DeBenedet's line of reasoning, and stated that there really wasn't anything else that you could do with the lot. She stated she was confident an appropriate home that would coincide with the other homes in the area would be constructed. Wiski asked whether grading would be a problem here, in view of the fact that the lot is much smaller. Honchell replied it would be more difficult, but it can certainly be addressed in the proper manner.