Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />February 5, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />DeBenedet wanted to know if both lots did meet the square footage <br />minimums with the dedication. Shardlow replied, yes, they would <br />meet the minimum. DeBenedet also asked what neighbors were <br />contacted. Ms. Elfstrom pointed out that she had talked to the <br />neighbors that were most directly impacted by the project. <br />Waldron stated that the formal notification was also sent to the <br />adjacent neighbors as required by ordinance. <br /> <br />Berry asked clarification with respect to how the new house would <br />be placed on the lot, which Ms. Elfstrom proceeded to point out. <br /> <br />Wiski asked for an explanation with respect to how the driveway <br />was placed on the existing lot. Mr. Elfstrom pointed out there <br />was a small amount of room that would allow an internal turn- <br />around. Ms. Elfstrom also pointed out that they will be moving <br />the garage that is currently on the lot line before the lot is <br />split. <br /> <br />Jim (?), neighbor, asked the Commission about the required <br />easement as he had fought a similar easement in the past, and <br />didn't want the City to use this requirement for the Elfstrom's <br />as a means of forcing him to consider the ten feet of requirement <br />in the future. Both Wiski and Honchell explained why the right- <br />of-way is required with respect to the County road plan. <br /> <br />Demos asked whether a dedication is required with a remodeling <br />request. Honchell replied that a policy exists that looks at <br />this item on a case by case basis. However, usually a fifty <br />percent modification is considered the threshold. Demos asked <br />whether the fifty percent is with respect to value or square <br />feet. Honchell replied that the fifty percent relates to value. <br /> <br />Moeller asked the Elfstroms if the ten foot dedication created <br />problems for them. The Elfstroms replied, no, it was not a <br />difficulty in light of the size of the lot. <br /> <br />Recommendation <br />Berry moved, Moeller seconded, that the Scott and Kathleen <br />Elfstrom request for division of lot at 728 West County Road C be <br />approved with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the 11.27 ft. jag in the lot be modified to 6.27 ft. <br />2. That the garage currently on the lot line be removed. <br />3 . That the ten foot right-of-way on County Road C be dedicated. <br />4. That an internal turnaround be developed on both lots. <br />