pm_860507 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes May 7, 1986 Page 2 2. That driveways not be allowed on the diagonal area of lot 2. 3. That both the existing north/south 15 foot utility easement, and the east/west 7.5 foot utility easement be converted to utility and drainage easements, with the widths remaining the same. These easements to be effective immediately, upon approval of the plat. Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Moeller, DeBenedet, Maschka, Johnson, Goedeke, and Wiski. Nays: None. Planning File 1657 Jerome Formo request for division of lot at 50 Mid Oaks Lane. Presentation Dahlgren discussed Mr. Formo's proposed lot split. In effect, the lot originally was split years ago, and Mr. Formo is simply requesting reestablishment of the original lines. The proposal is also in conformance with the minimum lot requirements. Mr. Formo basically reiterated Mr. Dahlgren's presentation. Greg Johnson, from the Mid Oaks Lane area, (neighbor) asked what the minimum width is for new lots. Dahlgren replied 80 feet of frontage, and 11,000 square feet total area. Johnson asked about the type of eventual house that is built there, and about the cutting down of trees. Dahlgren replied that there are no architectural controls, but there are setback controls. In addition, the City basically cannot regulate whether trees are cut down on private property. Recommendation DeBenedet moved, Goedeke seconded, approval of the Jerome Formo request for division of lot at 50 Mid Oaks Lane. Roll Call, Ayes: Berry, Moeller, DeBenedet, Maschka, Johnson, Goedeke, and Wiski. Nays: None. Planning File 1650 Northwestern College request for Special Use Permit and parking variance at 3003 N. Snelling Avenue. Presentation Waldron explained the fact that the City had been informed, by the Environmental Quality Board, that a petition has been presented requesting an Environmental Assessment Work Sheet relating to this development. Waldron pointed out that the Planning Commission can proceed to make a decision and that it is a recommendation, not a final decision as defined by the Environmental Quality Board. Thus, the Planning Commission can proceed with any of its recommendations, as originally planned, for the evening's agenda.