pm_860507 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes May 7, 1986 Page 5 Maschka stated again that the College should look at utilizing the traffic flow in this area as a one-way, and Ericksen agreed to review that request. Chuck Lethert, 3085 Asbury, asked whether landscaping was currently in the budget. Ericksen replied yes it is, as the College plants trees every year. Ruth Johnson, 3076 Shorewood Lane, stated it was her under- standing that at one time the College promised not to build anything on the bay area of the lake. Ericksen replied that they are trying to build the Health and Fitness Building in the most environmentally sound method as possible. The architects again proceeded to discuss the proposed landscaping in the area. Councilman Vern Johnson asked how close the Health and Fitness facility was to his house. Architect Johnson stated that the building shouldn't look any different than a two story house, and it is basically three football fields away from Mr. Johnson's property. Ericksen stated that there would be no major changes in terms of removing any shrubs. Vern Johnson asked for clarification of the roadway closing. Ericksen replied eighty percent of the time, the western roadway area would be closed. Councilman Vern Johnson asked why not close it entirely. Architect Johnson replied that the secondary access is needed for major events and fire. Councilman Johnson asked if the fields were going to be lit. Ericksen replied there would be no lighted fields in the area. Annette Phillips again asked for clarification on the height of the building. Architect Johnson replied it would be fifty-five feet at its highest point. Wiski asked if there are any buildings currently within the 40 foot range on campus. Architect Johnson replied yes. Mr. Fox, 3168 Shorewood Lane, asked why he was not notified. Dahlgren explained the notification process of the City. Waldron also checked the Abstract, and Mr. Fox was depicted on the Abstract. Fox also asked whether the Health and Fitness Building couldn't be drawn back further into the campus. Ericksen replied all options had been reviewed and, at this point in time, it was the most appropriate use of the site. Louise Steinworth, 3077 Asbury, asked whether doors on the existing dormitory have only a main entrance on the east. Ericksen replied no, there are some entrances on the western part. An unnamed resident asked how have the total number of students been projected. Ericksen proceeded to discuss the College's projections, and how those projections fit into their proposed building time frames.