Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />October 1, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Planning File 1695 <br />Group W Cable request for Special Use Permit at 934 Woodhill <br />Drive. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Mr. Dahlgren pointed out that Group W was given a special Use <br />Permit in 1983, and was now simply adding thirty-two spaces to the <br />east of the development. <br /> <br />Mr. Janisch discussed the proposed drainage on the site. <br /> <br />Mark Matthews, the administrator for Group W, introduced himself, <br />and stated he would respond to any questions. <br /> <br />Berry stated her concern with respect to the people who did not <br />receive notices based on the inaccuracies in the abstract. In <br />effect, the abstract had a number of wrong addresses, depicting <br />Woodhill addresses as County Road C addresses; thus, the majority <br />of the notices were returned. <br /> <br />Waldron pointed out that the reason the City requires a Certified <br />Abstract is that it places the burden on the title company to <br />develop a correct list of addresses, not the City or the <br />applicant. In this case, Minnesota Title certified that all <br />addresses depicted on the abstract were indeed correct. <br /> <br />Berry asked whether the paving was proper for this type of <br />development. Matthews replied that Group W will repave the drive- <br />way. Berry stated she was concerned about the three driveways <br />exiting on Woodhill. Janisch proceeded to discuss the rationale <br />for the three driveways. <br /> <br />Johnson asked as to whether the meeting could continue because of <br />the number of people who didn't receive notices. Waldron replied <br />that yes, it was entirely proper for the meeting to continue in <br />that the City is only required to make its best efforts to notify <br />residents. <br /> <br />Mr. Dahlgren also stated it was his opinion that the three drive- <br />way approach was the most workable. <br /> <br />Berry stated she was extremely concerned with the number of trucks <br />that were utilizing woodhill Drive. <br /> <br />Wiski asked whether Group W would consider "Right Turn Only" signs <br />at the exits. Matthews replied yes, that was appropriate. <br /> <br />Johnson asked about the fenced in area to the south of the <br />Matthews replied that based on the neighbors' suggestions, <br />decided to place additional landscaping in that area. <br /> <br />site. <br />he had <br /> <br />Johnson asked whether the "junk" would be removed. <br />replied yes, it would. <br /> <br />Matthews <br />