Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />October I, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Wi ski also asked what the property is that this <br />Burnsville. Parranto replied it was a Super 8, <br />other Heritage Inn was in Nebraska. Wiski asked <br />one in Bloomington. Peterson replied no. <br /> <br />developer owns in <br />and that the only <br />whether there was <br /> <br />Moeller asked whether the developers thought the back of the <br />building looked as good as the front. Hunslet said that you can <br />see brick and stucco from all sides. Moeller stated on the back, <br />there appears to be an extensive and long expanse of stucco. <br />Hunslet said possibly the addition of brick accent work could be <br />placed on the rear part of the property. <br /> <br />Moeller stated he understood the mechanical systems were under the <br />windows but with respect to the other units, where would they be <br />placed. Hunslet replied that all units would be to the south. <br /> <br />Berry asked if any consideration had been made for trailer <br />parking. Hunslet replied no, not specifically, but the additional <br />space for expansion could be utilized. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked if this met fire code. Hunslet replied yes, it <br />would have to be built within those parameters. <br /> <br />Maschka stated that he thought this was a good project, but not a <br />great project--that this will be the first development in the <br />gateway of the tax increment district, and at this point in time, <br />it does not meet City policy. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Johnson seconded, to deny the Tharladson <br />Enterprises request for Special Use Permit at 2210 County Road C, <br />based on the following findings~ <br /> <br />1. The proposed construction material is inappropriate, as it <br />does not meet City policy, and would negatively impact the TIF <br />area. <br /> <br />2. The site plan does not meet B-4 criteria in terms of intensity <br />and detailed planning. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />Berry stated that a hotel had already approved across the street, <br />which will be of very high quality. <br /> <br />Wiski stated that he agreed with Maschka, that the B-4 District <br />was designed for intensive development, and the landscape plan <br />should have been more detailed. In addition, the plan didn't show <br />the signage or trash pickup areas, and the north elevation did not <br />meet the B-4 criteria. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Moeller, Goedeke, Berry, Maschka, Johnson, and <br />wiski. <br />Nays: None. <br />