pm_861001 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes October 1, 1986 Page 7 Planning File 1696 Plaza Shoppes Associate's request for sign variance at 1739 North Lexington. Presentation Mr. Dahlgren discussed the site of the new development, and pointed out how the sign essentially conforms to the ordinance. The sign will be thirty feet from the old property line as required; however Paster Enterprises, pursuant to the City's request, is dedicating 16.5 feet to the City. Thus, the actual variance is 13.5 feet. Dahlgren pointed out that the sign is in essentially the same position as the other signs in the area. Reed Banet, of Paster Enterprises, showed an illustration of the sign, which is lit through the interior. Hannah Jankauskas, 1776 Lindy, asked what type of shops would be developed at this site. She proceeded to ask a number of questions relating to the development, as opposed to the sign. Wiski stated that these items have already been addressed at previous Planning Commission and Council meetings, and suggested that Ms. Jankauskas meet with Banet after the meeting to learn more specifics relating to the development, which are unrelated to the current issue before the Planning Commission. Goedeke asked what does First Minnesota think of this sign. Waldron replied that notices were mailed, Minnesota did not respond with any concerns. particular and First Maschka moved, Berry seconded, that Plaza Shoppes Associate's request for sign variance at 1739 North Lexington be approved. Roll Call, Ayes: Moeller, Goedeke, Berry, Maschka, Johnson, and Wiski. Nays: None. Planning File 1697 Carmen Dorso request for Special Use Permit at 2814 North Cleveland Avenue. Presentation Mr. Dahlgren discussed the current location where the bumpers are being stored. The bumpers are being stored in the I-2 District, which would require a Special Use Permit. Keystone is currently leasing the property from Dorso. John Dobney, attorney representing Dorso, claimed that had a valid nonconforming use at this point in time. opinion that bumpers and general trucking items were this area before Special Use was required; therefore, legal nonconforming use. the Dorso's It was his stored in this is a Wiski stated that it was not a nonconforming use, and that it was not even acceptable in the previous zoned area which was 1-1. The bumpers were not actually stored in the area until 1977.