My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_861203
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1986
>
pm_861203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:47 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/3/1986
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commision <br />December 3, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Goedeke asked Learning Tree if they were willing to absorb some <br />of the cost. Krause replied that they had not anticipated paying <br />any costs for construction of the private road. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked whether P.U.D. approval was contingent on the <br />road construction. Dahlgren replied that it was unless Dr. House <br />asked for a modification of the P.U.D. Dahlgren replied that the <br />plat is currently in place, and the construction of the road is a <br />good idea for the area. He also replied that the P.U.D. does not <br />allow full turning access in and out of the She lard site and <br />therefore the roadway, although not essential, greatly enhances <br />access. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that traffic safety is a real concern in this <br />area and that if the road is built, Learning Tree should utilize <br />the road for access. <br /> <br />Krause stated that the County had no problem with the utilization <br />of B-2 for access. <br /> <br />Moeller stated that the County was not informed of the private <br />road running to the east of the property and, therefore, might <br />have had a different opinion regarding the proposed access. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked whether the driveway could be properly separated <br />on the site as it is proposed. Janisch replied it could be. <br /> <br />Dahlgren replied there is a possibility of having House build the <br />private road only as far as the Learning Tree entrance, and then <br />Learning Tree would utilize the private road on the east. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that if Learning Tree has a contingent purchase <br />agreement with Dr. House that they simply don't close until House <br />agreed to build the driveway. <br /> <br />Johnson replied it is her opinion that the applicant should meet <br />with Dr. House immediately and resolve this situation. <br /> <br />Janisch asked whether a two week delay would significantly impact <br />the project. Krause replied that it would create some problems. <br /> <br />Moeller asked <br />requirements. <br />placed. <br /> <br />if the <br />Janisch <br /> <br />sign had been moved to meet <br />replied that it has now been <br /> <br />the City <br />properly <br /> <br />Berry moved, Johnson seconded, that the Learning Tree request for <br />Special Use Permit at 181 County Road B-2 be approved with the <br />following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the sandbox be removed from the City's drainage easement <br />area. <br /> <br />2. That the driveway be located to extend easterly to the <br />projected private street. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.