Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />March 4, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />Berry reiterated Johnson's concerns that the applicant didn't <br />meet with the neighborhood, and she is also concerned with <br />respect to the safety in the area and was inclined to deny the <br />application. <br /> <br />Stokes stated as a businessman, he thought the area could be a <br />great location but the developer didn't do his homework with <br />respect to the neighborhood and, thus, it may be appropriate that <br />the development be tabled. <br /> <br />Goedeke stated that a traffic engineer should take a look at the <br />impact on the area and agreed that the development should be <br />tabled. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked how long said application could be <br />Dahlgren replied sixty days. DeBenedet thought that a <br />should occur. <br /> <br />tabled. <br />tabling <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Goedeke seconded, to table (or adjourn public <br />hearing) to the April 1, 1987, Planning Commission meeting, thus <br />requesting that the applicant meet with the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />Stokes asked as to whether this could be completed in thirty <br />days. Dura replied that they hoped it could. <br /> <br />Dahlgren and Waldron again reiterated the fact that <br />developments such as this, applicants are always informed <br />they should be meeting with the neighbors. <br /> <br />in <br />that <br /> <br />A number of residents asked what the purpose of the continuation <br />really was, and what would occur April 1. Johnson replied that <br />it was to provide time for the applicant to meet with neighbors <br />and discuss potential development solutions. <br /> <br />Johnson pointed out that additional notices would not be forth- <br />coming in view of the fact that the hearing was being adjourned <br />to a later date. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, and <br />Johnson. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1728 <br />James H. Casey request for Special Use Permit and preliminary <br />plat at 1965 North Victoria. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Dahlgren discussed <br />Dahlgren discussed <br />driveway would work <br /> <br />the general area where the plat is proposed. <br />the potential lots and showed how the joint <br />with respect to the P.U.D. <br /> <br />Stokes asked as to whether more houses could be placed on one <br />lot. Dahlgren replied that theoretically they could. <br />