My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_870304
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1987
>
pm_870304
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:47 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
3/4/1987
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />March 4, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked how the potential tax increment assistance had <br />developed. Waldron replied that the City had asked for more <br />extensive landscaping while the developer had requested assis- <br />tance with potential soil correction needs. Waldron stated that <br />the City preferred not to participate with respect to the soil <br />corrections, but was willing to consider paying for enhanced <br />landscaping in the area. Sikora pointed out that the landscaping <br />would normally cost in the range of $20,000 for such a develop- <br />ment, but if the City were to participate in landscaping, they <br />would increase the landscaping by a commensurate amount. <br /> <br />Dahlgren reiterated the City's concern that based on <br />that this is in a quasi-gateway area to the City, <br />development should be properly landscaped. <br /> <br />the <br />that <br /> <br />fact <br />the <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that from the policy position, it may be more <br />appropriate simply to assist with soil correction that is in the <br />range of the landscape and sidewalk figure. <br /> <br />Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded, that the G. C. Rein Development <br />Company's request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment at 3090 Long <br />Lake Road be approved. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, and <br />Johnson. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Berry seconded, that the G. C. Rein Development <br />Company's request for rezoning and Special Use Permit at 3090 <br />Long Lake Road be approved with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the development will occur in accordance with plans <br />dated March 4, 1987. <br /> <br />2. That the easement be provided for the sidewalk as proposed, <br />east of Long Lake Road. <br /> <br />3. That the exterior of the structure shall be brick on all four <br />sides. <br /> <br />4. That the signs shall conform to the ordinance requirements. <br /> <br />5. That final engineering and landscape plans be approved by <br />staff. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, Moeller, Berry, and <br />Johnson. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Other Business <br />Waldron proceeded to discuss the current status of the Moratorium <br />and the schedule that was in place to complete the required <br />activities of the area. He also pointed out that the newspaper <br />article in the Roseville Review relating to the Moratorium con- <br />tained major inaccuracies with respect to the planning process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.