My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_870603
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1987
>
pm_870603
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:49 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/3/1987
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />June 3, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />Stokes asked if major fill activity was occurring on <br />Hanson replied that there was not, but that there was <br />occurring further to the north. <br /> <br />the site. <br />activity <br /> <br />Goedeke asked as to whether the water and sewer were appropriate <br />in the area. Janisch replied that he was not sure, but he is <br />quite confident that sewer and water is available in the area. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked for clarification of the lakeshore setback, which <br />Janisch verified at thirty-six feet. Janisch also stated his <br />concern with respect to the proper elevation of the walkout area. <br /> <br />Johnson asked how old the homes were to <br />replied that they were built between 1965 <br />pointed out that these homes were then built <br />ordinances were established. <br /> <br />the north. Hanson <br />and 1967. Johnson <br />before the shoreline <br /> <br />Moeller stated his concern with respect to the <br />elevations. <br /> <br />basement <br /> <br />Cushman stated her concern with respect to the applicant actually <br />being able to properly develop on the site. <br /> <br />Stokes asked a question as to whether borings had occurred on the <br />site. Hanson replied that they had done some soil borings. <br />Stokes also stated his concern that this area shows up on a <br />Federal Flood Plain Map, plus the curve on Victoria is quite <br />dangerous. <br /> <br />Doug Reynolds, speaking for a neighbor on the north, asked what <br />type of conditions the City would place on the development as a <br />result of poor soil. Janisch replied that the soil review would <br />be handled by the Building Inspector. <br /> <br />Maurice Merabella (across the street from the development) asked <br />whether other areas adjacent to this property would automatically <br />start developing. Janisch replied that would depend on any <br />proposals that would come forth for consideration. Janisch <br />stated he is aware that Reiling is considering some platting in <br />the area. <br /> <br />Johnson pointed out that the building would be about one story <br />higher than the other homes in the area, and it would have a peak <br />of roughly twenty-five feet. <br /> <br />Mary Ky10 (owner of the home adjacent to the development) stated <br />her concern about traffic in the area. Hanson stated that with <br />the house thirty feet back, the home is not in danger. He also <br />stated it is his understanding, based on some new laws, that if <br />the home owner can't develop, the City would have to compensate <br />the landowner. <br /> <br />Dahlgren replied that he was aware of the law that stated when <br />the new ordiance went into effect in 1959, that if an area met <br />seventy percent of the new standards, a development could proceed. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.