Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />August 5, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Don Hamilton <br />preserved for <br />analysis from <br />park area. <br /> <br />stated it was his concern that the park should be <br />the families in the area, and he formally requested <br />the Park Board on the ramifications of losing this <br /> <br />Walter McQuaid, 1171 West Burke, asked for clarification of the <br />recreational use on the site. Jody Yungers pointed out that the <br />hockey rink, under the current proposal, could not remain on the <br />softball field based on the wear and tear on the turf. <br /> <br />Bill Bakeman, 1178 County Road B, asked why couldn't the north <br />half be developed as a commercial area, and the south half as a <br />park. <br /> <br />Jerry Wilkins stated that the notice should have gone to more <br />than 350 feet, and that he was also opposed to the rezoning. He <br />also stated that the City should stick to its Comprehensive Plan. <br /> <br />Johnson clarified the fact that the Comprehensive Plan is simply <br />a guide that is often clarified and modified throughout the <br />planning process. <br /> <br />Another resident in the area pointed out that they had purchased <br />a home in the area because they specifically wanted to be across <br />from the park. <br /> <br />Kaufhold said to the residents that he didn't want to be a bad <br />neighbor, but pointed out his financial constraints on the site. <br /> <br />Johnson stated it was her <br />work, because the park <br />overall development. It <br />was required. <br /> <br />opinion that this proposal would not <br />buffer is critical to facilitate the <br />was her opinion that more negotiation <br /> <br />Maschka stated in his opinion, the School Board is the problem by <br />placing such a high price on the property. In his opinion, the <br />parkland component is critical to the development and, therefore, <br />the zoning should be denied, thus sending a message to the School <br />Board. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Berry seconded, to deny the Gerald Kaufhold <br />request for rezoning, Comprehensive Plan Amendement, preliminary <br />plat, and variance at 1130 County Road B. <br /> <br />Berry stated she agreed that the park <br />use to the north appeared workable. <br />School District over valued the land, <br />too expensive for the park. <br /> <br />was critical; however, the <br />It was her opinion that the <br />and that the cost was just <br /> <br />Dahlgren <br />proposal <br />based on <br />hurried. <br /> <br />suggested it may be more appropriate <br />to allow for additional negotiations. <br />the signficance of this development, <br /> <br />to table this <br />He stated that <br />it should not be <br />