pm_870902 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Roseville Planning Commission Minutes September 2, 1987 Page 6 Berry thanked the neighbors for their concern, and stated this is how one really learns how government works. She also clarified that Har Mar and Lexington Plaza were already zoned commercial and, therefore, the developers had the right to develop com- mercial projects on those sites. The Planning Commission and City Council could essentially only complete a site plan review as it related to these developments. Berry also stated her concern that other significant options for this site were not considered and the fact that the developer did not use an inde- pendent appraisal of his own during the negotiation process. Moeller stated it was obvious to him that this proposal clearly did not meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, and Moeller. Nays: None. Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded, that the Gerald Kaufhold request for rezoning at 1130 County Road B be denied based on the following findings of fact: 1. That the size and intensity of the rezoning request is not consistent with the Lexington area, particularly as it relates to the proposed B-3 use. 2. That the proposal runs counter to the City's policy of dis couraging commerical strip development on Lexington. 4. That the City has sought to protect and preserve R-1 zoning where it currently is in place. That the adjacent areas to the south are zoned R-1. That the plan amendment and rezoning are inconsistent with the current land use in the area. 3. 5. 6. That the rezoning is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, Goedeke, and Moeller. Nays: None. DeBenedet moved, Maschka seconded, that Gerald Kaufhold's request for a preliminary plat and variance at 1130 County Road B be denied based on the following findings of fact: 1. That the size and intensity of the rezoning request is not consistent with the Lexington area, particularly as it relates to the proposed B-3 use. 2. That the proposal runs counter to the City's policy of dis- couraging commerical strip development on Lexington.