My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_870902
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1987
>
pm_870902
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:50 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
9/2/1987
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville Planning Commission Minutes <br />September 2, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />That the City has sought to protect and preserve R-1 zoning <br />where it currently is in place. <br />That the adjacent areas to the south are zoned R-1. <br />That the plan amendment and rezoning are inconsistent with <br />the current land use in the area. <br /> <br />3 . <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />6. That the rezoning is inconsistent with the Comprehensive <br />Plan. <br /> <br />Moeller stated that even if this proposal was <br />needs in the area, he would have been very <br />such a project based on the lack of detail <br />Commission currently had available. <br /> <br />consistent with the <br />leary of approving <br />that the Planning <br /> <br />Stokes asked for clarification with respect to the zoning on some <br />of the surrounding areas. Dahlgren replied that most of the <br />businesses, such as Super America, etc., in the area were zoned <br />B-3. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, <br />Goedeke, and Moeller. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Cushman proceeded to thank all of the citizens for <br />cerns, and discussed some past history relating to <br />Cushman also proceeded to clarify City policy, which <br />trating commercial efforts in the northwest area of <br />She also clarified the Hamline issue as it related to <br />homes for commercial use. <br /> <br />their con- <br />the area. <br />is concen- <br />the City. <br />the use of <br /> <br />Planning File 1788 <br />Don Roberts request for sign variance at 2465 North Fairview <br />Avenue. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Dahlgren proceeded to discuss the site, and pointed out how <br />Roberts basically does not have a pylon sign for his operation to <br />the south, as the available signage was locked up in a lease for <br />another tenant on the site. Dahlgren pointed out that an addi- <br />tional pylon sign, which was the variance request, is not a prob- <br />lem in and of itself; however, the precedent that would be set is <br />dangerous. <br /> <br />Johnson proceeded to read a letter from Roberts, stating that he <br />could not attend the meeting. Johnson pointed out that a <br />potential solution could exist by limiting the time of the second <br />pylon to 1993 when the other lease expired. <br /> <br />Maschka asked whether the sign would be lit. <br />appeared it was a wood sign. <br /> <br />Johnson stated it <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.