My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_871104
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1987
>
pm_871104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:51 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
11/4/1987
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Planning Commission Minutes <br />November 4, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Goedeke asked about the parking requirements. Truax replied that <br />they will have sixty allocated to The Gym, with ninety actually <br />being available. In addition, he pointed out that there is <br />signficant parking in the rear that is currently unused. Truax <br />pointed out that The Gym's peak hours are different from the <br />adjacent businesses. <br /> <br />Stokes asked as to whether parking requirements are different <br />between warehouses, businesses, etc. Dahlgren replied that yes, <br />in this case it is five per one thousand, and that the applicants <br />meet that requirement. <br /> <br />Johnson asked what would happen if the parking turned out to be a <br />problem. Dahlgren replied that the area in the back is the same <br />property, and that it could easily handle a major parking influx. <br />He reiterated that the peak is different for this type of gym <br />use. <br /> <br />Cushman asked who is responsible for the parking in this <br />situation. Dahlgren replied that the owner allocates the parking <br />spaces, and the City monitors to make sure that the uses are, <br />indeed, appropriate. <br /> <br />Goedeke asked how the signage was going to be used. <br />replied he wanted one on the rear, one adjacent to B-2, <br />small one over the entrance. <br /> <br />Truax <br />and a <br /> <br />Berry pointed out that the sign would have to conform with all <br />codes. The applicant did state he had met with Mr. Beseth <br />preliminarly. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Goedeke seconded, that The Gym - Roseville, Inc. <br />request for Special Use Permit at 2434 Prior Avenue North be <br />approved. <br /> <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Johnson, Maschka, Berry, Stokes, DeBenedet, <br />Goedeke and Moeller. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Planning File 1812 <br />C. G. Rein request to amend all business zones by adding "Dry <br />Cleaning Processing" as a permitted use. <br /> <br />Presentation <br />Dahlgren pointed out that when the ordinance was first developed <br />in 1959, the dry cleaning process was far different than it is <br />today. He pointed out that processing can be done today in a <br />very clean and safe manner. He pointed out that the ordinance <br />only allows drop offs at this point in time. <br /> <br />Bill Sikora, from C. G. Rein, proceeded to discuss the specifica- <br />tions relating to the new modifications, and did make one modifi- <br />cation in the ordinance. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.