My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_880106
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
pm_880106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:51 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/6/1988
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page # 16 <br /> <br />Wednesday, January 6, 1988 <br /> <br />himself on the new lot, and that neighbors have not express any <br />concern or opposition to his proposal. <br /> <br />DeBenedet inquired about whether the water line location was <br />correct as shown on the site plan. He also inquired whether <br />there were easements in place for these water line. <br /> <br />Berry responded that was correct, and that she believed the <br />easements were required when the city acquired the water lines <br />from the private water company. <br /> <br />Janisch responded that city records show that the water lines are <br />at the location shown. DeBenedet asked if easements were in <br />place. Janisch responded that he could check. DeBenedet <br />indica ted that we could stipulate that easements for the water <br />line be provided as part of the lot division approval. <br /> <br />Goedeke inquired whether or not the lots were undersized. <br />Dahlgren responded that new lots are required to be 85 ft. wide <br />and have ll000 sq. ft. City policy is that where there is in <br />fill development, policy is to approve divisions which are <br />consistent with the area. The question in this case is whether <br />to have 2 smaller lots, or one large lot. The lot sizes being <br />proposed are common to other areas, and the new house would <br />conform to the larger 10 ft. set back requirements. <br /> <br />Betty McClain, 2847 Oxford Street, indicated her support for the <br />project. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Goedeke seconded that Norm Vinnes request for <br />division of platted lot at 28ll North Oxford Street be <br />recommended for approval with the following condition: <br /> <br />1. That any necessary easements be granted to the City, if <br />Staff determines that they do not currently exist. <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />Moeller, DeBenedet, Berry, Goedeke, <br />Maschka, Stokes <br />None <br /> <br />Roll Call; <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Other Business: <br /> <br />Stokes inquired whether a post office could be allowed in a B-1 <br />zoning district. Dahlgren responded that the city's ordinance <br />could be amended to allow a post office in a B-I zone by special <br />use permit. The Planning Commission could recommend such an <br />action to the City Council. Waldron indicated that the City <br />Council would have to refer the matter back to the Planning <br />Commission and then the Planning Commission could recommend <br />Council approval of the amendment. Stokes moved and DeBenedet <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.