My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_880106
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
pm_880106
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:51 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:45 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
1/6/1988
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page 13 <br /> <br />Wednesday, January 6, 1988 <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked what kind of park land dedication Mr. Seltz would <br />consider. Seltz replied that he would consider dedicating the <br />west half of Parcel A and a triangular portion of Parcel B. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if the city had access to the lake. Janisch <br />indicated the city has a storm sewer easement, not access <br />easement. Janisch indicated that the proposed ponding easement <br />would serve the city's needs. <br /> <br />DeBenedet inquired if the hammerhead turnaround would become a <br />guest parking lot which would restrict the turnaround. Janisch <br />indicated that he felt that it would not become a parking lot and <br />sufficient room exists to turnaround. <br /> <br />Berry closed the hearing. <br /> <br />Cushman asked if the city owned lots on the south side of South <br />Owasso Boulevard. Janisch indicated that the city had acquired <br />the lots between Matilda and Galtier. <br /> <br />Cushman asked if these lots would provide parking for canoe <br />access to the lake. Janisch indicated that was not the intent. <br /> <br />Berry stated that she was disappointed that the council did not <br />want to purchase the site for the park, but that this proposal <br />seemed realistic. Berry indicated that she liked the fact that <br />the house on Parcel B is being kept away from the powerlines <br />because studies have shown that power lines can have an adverse <br />impact on health including higher spontaneous abortion rates. <br /> <br />Cushman indicated that the council felt that the additional park <br />is not necessary because the shoreline is adequately protected <br />already. Cushman stated that the proposal was a reasonable way <br />to handle the site and that she appreciated the cooperation Mr. <br />Seltz has shown. <br /> <br />Maschka asked how the park land dedication should be handled. <br />Dahlgren suggested that the east line of the park be extended <br />northward through Parcel A. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, DeBenedet seconded that the John S. Seltz request <br />for division of lot at 210 and 220 Woodland Avenue be approved <br />with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the driveway width of the southerly most lot, <br />shall be a minimum of 12 ft., and adequate provision at <br />the end shall be made for a turnaround for a fire <br />truck if determined necessary by the Fire Marshall. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.