pm_880106 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Page #4 Wednesday, January 6, 1988 2. That a separate sewer and water line be extended separately to each lot. 3. That the divisions approved shall apply to two (2) single family dwellings only. 4. That the appropriate ponding easement be granted to the City. 5. That the City accept dedication of the park land (approx. the westerly 295 sq. ft. of lot 44 except for the north 250 ft.) subject to Staff approval. 6. That the appropriate land be dedicated to the City for cuI de sac purposes to the north. DeBenedet suggested that the park land dedication should be clarified to be more specific. Dahlgren suggested that the dedication be described as the west 295.55 of lot 44 perpendicular to the shoreline, except the north 250 feet. Stokes asked if we could legally require Mr. Seltz to dedicate half his property. Waldron responded that the recent Supreme Court decisions have made this less clear, but that he felt that the city could make a case because the site has been designated as park for a long time and that a public purpose could be demonstrated. Dahlgren stated that Mr. Seltz had suggested the dedication and agreed with to it. Dahlgren indicated that the dedication would be to Mr. Seltz's benefit because the city would maintain it, there would be no public access or use and the dedication could be used as a tax deduction. Both parties would benefit from this dedication. Maschka agreed to the amendment to the motion as stated by Dahlgren to clarify the park land dedication. Seltz indicated that he had no problem with the motion as long as the park land dedication is finalized to his satisfaction and that there be an assessment reduction to reflect the smaller land area. Cushman stated she felt the proposal would benefit all parties. Roll Call, Ayes: Nays: Moeller, DeBenedet, Berry, Goedeke, Maschka, Stokes None