Laserfiche WebLink
<br />5 <br /> <br />determination, but that some have been overturned. Maschka <br />indicated that he felt that because of the uniqueness of this <br />case that an agreement might be justifiable. Dahlgren indicated <br />that the post office would appear to be an appropriate use on the <br />site, but there is no assurance that they will be there. <br />Dahlgren indicated that it is important to have the best location <br />for the post office, but he couldn't say that this particular <br />location was the best. It might work, but there could be a place <br />with less impact. <br /> <br />DeBenedet indicated that there were questions asked at the <br />previous meetings that have not been answered. DeBenedet asked a <br />question about the values for the property. Dahlgren indicated <br />that it is not the place of government to dig into Kaufhold's <br />private business deals, and that the value issue was not one <br />which the planning commission should be dealing with. <br /> <br />Maschka questioned whether or not the city would have to rezone <br />all three (3) parcels. Dahlg ren responded that the city can <br />rezone less land than was published, but they can not rezone <br />more. Maschka asked Kaufhold if he would have to have all three <br />parcels rezoned at this time. Kaufhold indicated that he needs <br />to know what is happening on the whole proposal. If nothing is <br />rezoned, then he will have to sub-divide the proposed park land <br />and sell single family lots to defer his costs and to make the <br />rest of the deal worK. If it is zoned, he can take that <br />information to the bank and get financing, which will allow him <br />to sell and give the city park land as proposed. Maschka asked <br />what would happen if parcel A vlere not rezoned. Kaufhold <br />indicated that he could not proceed with the project and could <br />not sell park land to the city. Maschka asked what would happen <br />during the two years until the post office could proceed. <br />Kaufhold indicated that he would be renewing the lease with the <br />existing tenant, which would provide him income, until the post <br />office proceeds. <br /> <br />Moeller inquired if the park land was sub-divided into single <br />family lots, would a 10% dedication be required. Dahlgren <br />indicated that at the time the plat was filed, 10% of the land <br />must be dedicated, or money in lieu of land must be provided. <br />The 10% would be applied to the total area of land within the <br />plat. <br /> <br />Maschka asked if the project was approved without rezoning parcel <br />A would the applicant proceed to sub-divide and proceed with the <br />development on parcel B. Kaufhold indicated that he would <br />proceed with the whole thing at the same time. Kaufhold <br />indicated that he would not proceed without approval of the whole <br />development. If it were not approved, he has no choice but to <br />sell the lots off. <br /> <br />Dunwell indicated that one of the problems with only zoning part <br />