My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_880203
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
pm_880203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:52 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/3/1988
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />5 <br /> <br />determination, but that some have been overturned. Maschka <br />indicated that he felt that because of the uniqueness of this <br />case that an agreement might be justifiable. Dahlgren indicated <br />that the post office would appear to be an appropriate use on the <br />site, but there is no assurance that they will be there. <br />Dahlgren indicated that it is important to have the best location <br />for the post office, but he couldn't say that this particular <br />location was the best. It might work, but there could be a place <br />with less impact. <br /> <br />DeBenedet indicated that there were questions asked at the <br />previous meetings that have not been answered. DeBenedet asked a <br />question about the values for the property. Dahlgren indicated <br />that it is not the place of government to dig into Kaufhold's <br />private business deals, and that the value issue was not one <br />which the planning commission should be dealing with. <br /> <br />Maschka questioned whether or not the city would have to rezone <br />all three (3) parcels. Dahlg ren responded that the city can <br />rezone less land than was published, but they can not rezone <br />more. Maschka asked Kaufhold if he would have to have all three <br />parcels rezoned at this time. Kaufhold indicated that he needs <br />to know what is happening on the whole proposal. If nothing is <br />rezoned, then he will have to sub-divide the proposed park land <br />and sell single family lots to defer his costs and to make the <br />rest of the deal worK. If it is zoned, he can take that <br />information to the bank and get financing, which will allow him <br />to sell and give the city park land as proposed. Maschka asked <br />what would happen if parcel A vlere not rezoned. Kaufhold <br />indicated that he could not proceed with the project and could <br />not sell park land to the city. Maschka asked what would happen <br />during the two years until the post office could proceed. <br />Kaufhold indicated that he would be renewing the lease with the <br />existing tenant, which would provide him income, until the post <br />office proceeds. <br /> <br />Moeller inquired if the park land was sub-divided into single <br />family lots, would a 10% dedication be required. Dahlgren <br />indicated that at the time the plat was filed, 10% of the land <br />must be dedicated, or money in lieu of land must be provided. <br />The 10% would be applied to the total area of land within the <br />plat. <br /> <br />Maschka asked if the project was approved without rezoning parcel <br />A would the applicant proceed to sub-divide and proceed with the <br />development on parcel B. Kaufhold indicated that he would <br />proceed with the whole thing at the same time. Kaufhold <br />indicated that he would not proceed without approval of the whole <br />development. If it were not approved, he has no choice but to <br />sell the lots off. <br /> <br />Dunwell indicated that one of the problems with only zoning part <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.