Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page://: 15 <br /> <br />Wednesday, May 4, 1988 <br /> <br />except for ingress or egress openings. <br />shall be face brick or equal. <br /> <br />Exterior finishing <br /> <br />Stokes pointed out that mini-storage may be appropriate in other <br />districts, that they might be multi-floor buildings, have <br />apartments, for caretakers and that they were interim uses and as <br />such, property owners would be concerned about the amount of <br />investment required. <br /> <br />Johnson expressed the need for quality development. <br /> <br />Berry inquired about how signs would be handled in light of bad <br />signage at mini-storage in other communities. <br /> <br />Dahlgren responded that signs would be handled as other uses <br />through the existing sign ordinance. <br /> <br />Stokes commented that it may be appropriate to regulate the type <br />of paving, curbing, and other details. <br /> <br />Dahlgren replied that detailed requirements are not necessary and <br />that these issues can be dealt with through general ordinance <br />provisions as with other uses. <br /> <br />Moeller questioned whether the apartments for caretakers would be <br />allowed. Dahlgren pointed out that the ordinance allows <br />apartments such as these in Industrial districts. <br /> <br />Stokes questioned whether mini-storage would be restricted only <br />to Industrial zoning districts. Johnson responded that mini- <br />storage would not be appropriate in other districts. Dahlgren <br />added that within the Roseville context, mini-storage would be <br />appropriate only in the I-I and 1-2 context. <br /> <br />DeBenedet inquired whether brick or equal requirement would be <br />too restrictive because in some applications stone or tilt a <br />brick may be appropriate. Dahlgren responded that the city could <br />consider these as brick or equal, but not bare concrete. <br /> <br />DeBenedet suggested that even though mini-storage might be an <br />interim land use, typically there is minimal investment on <br />interiors. Potential developers could provide higher quality <br />exteriors and then at a future time convert to other uses by <br />upgrading interior spaces. <br /> <br />Dahlgren responded that the industry is seeing new products with <br />more investment and permanent investments in mini-storage because <br />it provides a good rate of return. <br />