Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page://: <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br />Wednesday, May 4, 1988 <br /> <br />traffic concerns, he questioned building on fill and opposed the <br />proposed 5 foot setback variances. <br /> <br />Bruce Nelson, 2887 West Owasso, indicated his opposition to the <br />proposal in that the open space in the area should be protected. <br /> <br />Debenedet pointed out that the city and county had a chance to <br />protect the open space, but declined to do it, and indicated <br />concern about acquiring and maintaining small open space parcels <br />on Lake Owasso. Debenedet further stated that the right of way <br />dedication requirements are appropriate and that the city is not <br />obligated to grant special considerations because of that. <br />Debenedet opposed the set back variances because of traffic and <br />speed on victoria street and turn around requirements in front of <br />the buildings would make the 25 foot set back difficult. <br />Debenedet also stated that the city should not accept outlots A <br />and B. <br /> <br />Goedeke inquired if the city could exclude outlots A and B from <br />the plat. Dahlgren indicated that by designating the lots as <br />outlots, they are not buildable, but that the city could combine <br />outlots A and B into a single outlot. <br /> <br />Stokes questioned why the lot lines went out into the lake rather <br />than at the meander line, and expressed the opinion that the lot <br />lines should end at the water line of the lake. Dahlgren <br />answered that this was a technical issue which could be checked <br />and resolved with the final plat. <br /> <br />Stokes pointed out that it would be nice to have a specific <br />location of the high water lines so that future property owners <br />would be clear on the issue. Honchell pointed out that DNR <br />surveyors have established their line, and that no building <br />permit could be issued for new development without first <br />obtaining a shoreline permit. <br /> <br />Berry testified that she shares concerns expressed by others, but <br />that Reiling has a right to develop the property within DNR Corps <br />of Engineer and City regulations. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned whether outlots could be sold and whether <br />owners could get a permit to build on them. Honchell replied <br />that outlots are not buildable and that no development could not <br />occur without removing the outlot designation by re-platting the <br />property. DeBenedet commented that it has been difficult for the <br />city to turn down variances in the past, and would be concerned <br />that development could ultimately occur on the outlots. <br />