My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_880601
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
pm_880601
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:54 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/1/1988
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pagett <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 1, 1988 <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Goedeke, <br />Johnson <br /> <br />Berry, <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Maschka, <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />stokes <br /> <br />Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded to recommend approval of rezoning <br />the site from R-1 to B-1. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Goedeke, <br />Johnson <br /> <br />Berry, <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Maschka, <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />stokes <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Goedeke seconded to recommend approval of a 5 <br />ft. parking lot setback variance with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the development be constructed consistent with the <br />plans as submitted and reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />2. That the development be constructed as outlined in the <br />applicants letter dated April 28, 1988. <br /> <br />3. That the site plan be revised and approved by staff to <br />resolve landscaping and drainage details. <br /> <br />4. Appropriate screening including fencing and landscaping <br />be provided along the west edge of the new parking lot. <br /> <br />5. That a sidewalk be constructed along Marion street or <br />appropriate funds escrowed for a future sidewalk in <br />accordance with City policy. <br /> <br />6. That snow storage and snow melt run off be considered <br />as part of the drainage plan. <br /> <br />Stokes questioned whether a berm could be constructed so that <br />snow melt would go to the east and not directly down the hill. <br />Johnson responded that there is not much room for snow storage <br />and snow may have to be removed. DeBenedet commented that this <br />would be considered as part of the drainage plan. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Goedeke, Berry, <br />Stokes, Johnson <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Maschka, <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that there were a number of details requiring <br />staff attention in this particular case and staff should be <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.