Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pagett <br /> <br />6 <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 1, 1988 <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Goedeke, <br />Johnson <br /> <br />Berry, <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Maschka, <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />stokes <br /> <br />Berry moved, DeBenedet seconded to recommend approval of rezoning <br />the site from R-1 to B-1. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Goedeke, <br />Johnson <br /> <br />Berry, <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Maschka, <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />stokes <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved, Goedeke seconded to recommend approval of a 5 <br />ft. parking lot setback variance with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That the development be constructed consistent with the <br />plans as submitted and reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />2. That the development be constructed as outlined in the <br />applicants letter dated April 28, 1988. <br /> <br />3. That the site plan be revised and approved by staff to <br />resolve landscaping and drainage details. <br /> <br />4. Appropriate screening including fencing and landscaping <br />be provided along the west edge of the new parking lot. <br /> <br />5. That a sidewalk be constructed along Marion street or <br />appropriate funds escrowed for a future sidewalk in <br />accordance with City policy. <br /> <br />6. That snow storage and snow melt run off be considered <br />as part of the drainage plan. <br /> <br />Stokes questioned whether a berm could be constructed so that <br />snow melt would go to the east and not directly down the hill. <br />Johnson responded that there is not much room for snow storage <br />and snow may have to be removed. DeBenedet commented that this <br />would be considered as part of the drainage plan. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Goedeke, Berry, <br />Stokes, Johnson <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Maschka, <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that there were a number of details requiring <br />staff attention in this particular case and staff should be <br />