My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_880706
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
pm_880706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:55 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/6/1988
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page:#: 17 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 6, 1988 <br /> <br />Anderson asked if there would be hearings before C-2 would be <br />constructed. Dahlgren responded that yes there would. <br /> <br />Paul McLean, 2855 Oxford street, pointed out that he lives east <br />of Lexington, and that he typically has a 5 minute wait to get <br />onto Lexington at C-2. McLean inquired about what would happen <br />to the other vacant land in the area, and pointed out that there <br />were enough shopping malls in that particular area, and that the <br />single family neighborhood should be protected. <br /> <br />Katie Harms, 2835 Merrill, testified that other up-scale <br />developments have changed to condominiums. Harms stated that <br />this type of proj ect is more appropriate in Eagan, and not in <br />congested Roseville. Harms suggested that Roseville doesn't have <br />to be totally developed, and that she could not see many benefits <br />to residents in the area. <br /> <br />MCCulloch, 2718 Griggs, pointed out concerns over traffic in the <br />area, the potential for increased police calls, concern about a <br />parking lot being located adjacent to his property and with the <br />potential impact of this development on the existing water <br />problem which he has in his back yard. Gregory responded that <br />all of the drainage from their site will go to the east, and that <br />landscaping and berming will be provided on residential <br />properties. Keel stated that the city policy is that when new <br />parking lots are developed, that they will have to have proper <br />drainage and not cause problems. <br /> <br />John Savre, 2843 Dellwood, stated that the neighborhood doesn't <br />want this project. <br /> <br />Leslie Berry commented that other options need to be explored <br />which include ownership, housing, and less density. Berry stated <br />that it is not the job to protect the developer, but to protect <br />the neighborhood, and to protect the quality of life in <br />Roseville. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Moeller stated that the amenity level indicated that this <br />project might be converted to condominiums in the future and <br />asked what the developers track record was on conversion. <br />Gregory responded that his company had not converted any of it's <br />buildings so far, and had no intention of doing that, but that <br />the option is being left open. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.