Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pagett <br /> <br />7 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 6, 1988 <br /> <br />Johnson replied that the Park Board turned down a previous <br />proposal, and not this particular one. <br /> <br />Maschka indicated that he was uncomfortable with the reason for <br />denial. Dahlgren outlined that land use plan and zoning of the <br />site and indicated that the city needs to be comfortable that <br />what is being proposed is right, and that he is not sure if it is <br />the right solution because of the uncertainty of the long term <br />use of the site. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that litigation is a problem. <br /> <br />Dahlgren stated that the city has never taken just a piece of a <br />development, but that they have required a total solution in <br />other cases. Overall plans must be approved even if the <br />development occurs in phases. <br /> <br />Dunwell pointed out that the comprehensive plan amendment is just <br />a guide while zoning is the law. Dahlgren responded that under <br />Minnesota laws that the comprehensive plan amendment is needed <br />first and that the zoning occurs afterwards and must be <br />consistent with the comprehensive plan amendment. <br /> <br />Berry called the question. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Maschka, Moeller, Berry, DeBenedet, <br />Johnson, Goedeke <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />stokes <br /> <br />Berry moved, Debenedet seconded to recommend denial of the <br />preliminary plat because the proposal was not consistent with the <br />city's comprehensive plan, that the applicant failed to provide a <br />long term plan for the total si te, that the sanitary sewer <br />location is not acceptable to staff, and that the applicant has <br />requested only low density on a portion of the site, and not on <br />the total site. <br /> <br />stokes asked if the comprehensive plan change has to be requested <br />by the applicant before action is taken by the commission. <br /> <br />DeBenedet pointed out that the change was discussed with the <br />applicant. <br /> <br />Dahlgren stated that the correct procedure was being followed. <br />Roll Call: Ayes: Maschka, Moeller, Berry, DeBenedet, <br />Stokes, Johnson, DeBenedet <br />