My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_880706
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
pm_880706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:55 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:37:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/6/1988
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pagej <br /> <br />8 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 6, 1988 <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq File 1865 <br /> <br />Valento request for lot division at 324 W. County Road B. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the proposal and it's location. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if any assessments are due on this property. <br />Keel responded that there are none due on this property. <br /> <br />Mrs. Ludke, 1816 Beebe Road, indicated that they wanted to buy <br />the lot in the past but were told that they couldn't split the <br />lot because it didn't have the required minimum 80ft. width. <br />Dahlgren replied that the current requirement is 85 ft., but that <br />the city could approve smaller lots if the proposed lots were in <br />scale with others in the neighborhood. Dahlgren stated that the <br />proposal seemed reasonable in light of the fact that there is a <br />75 ft. lot next door. <br /> <br />Ludke pointed out that there is a swamp in the back and inquired <br />about the effect of the proposal on the swamp. <br /> <br />Dahlgren responded that natural drainage to the swamp would be <br />maintained and that the house would be constructed on the high <br />land and the swamp left where it is. <br /> <br />Berry requested that staff review the lot sizes in the area. <br /> <br />Dahlgren outlined the lot sizes in the area surrounding the <br />proposal showing that the proposed lots were in scale. <br /> <br />Mrs. Krispin, 322 W. County Road B, questioned the need for a <br />variance from zoning standards, and pointed out that they bought <br />in the area because of the large lot sizes and stated a concern <br />about the potential for dense and congested housing in the area <br />and the affect on natural drainage in the area. Krispin said <br />she had concerns that the proposal would result in her having a <br />wet lot. <br /> <br />Dean Sidvrandt, a California resident, questioned why the city <br />would want to accept sub-standard lots. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.