Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page#12 <br /> <br />Wednesday, October 12, 1988 <br /> <br />Berry moved and stokes seconded to recommend denial of the <br />requested rezoning from R-1 to R-3A based on the following: <br /> <br />1. The proposal does not really address resolved water pressure <br />and fire protection problems. <br /> <br />2. The traffic generated from the project will adversely affect <br />traffic conditions on adjacent roads. <br /> <br />3. The traffic volumes will affect the safety of children <br />walking to Central Park Elementary School. <br /> <br />4. The project was subject to extensive neighborhood <br />opposition. <br /> <br />5. The issue of City purchase of the school and 10 acres for <br />recreation center should be separated completely from the <br />housing project. <br /> <br />6. The proposed density of development is inconsistent with the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br /> <br />7. The rezoning is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Berry, Goedeke, Stokes, Maschka, <br />Moeller, DeBenedet, Johnson <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Stokes seconded to recommend denial of a <br />special use permit for PUD and a preliminary plat based on the <br />following: <br /> <br />1. The proposal does not clearly address the issue of water <br />pressure and fire protection problems. <br /> <br />2. Traffic generated from the project will adversely affect the <br />traffic conditions on adjacent roads. <br /> <br />3. The traffic volumes will affect the safety of children <br />walking to Central Park Elementary School. <br /> <br />4. The project was subject to extensive neighborhood <br />opposition. <br /> <br />5. The issue of the City purchase of the school and 10 acres <br />for recreation center should be separated completely from <br />the housing project. <br />