Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page#13 <br /> <br />Wednesday, October 12, 1988 <br /> <br />6. The proposed density of development is inconsistent with the <br />surrounding neighborhood. <br /> <br />7. The rezoning is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. <br /> <br />8. The lack of a completed environmental assessment worksheet <br />for the project. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Berry, Goedeke, Stokes, Maschka, <br />Moeller, DeBenedet, Johnson <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Johnson recessed the meeting at 11:20 p.m. <br />reconvened at 11:33 p.m. <br /> <br />The meeting <br /> <br />Planninq File 1871 <br /> <br />Enlargement of the City's Tax Increment Finance District #10 and <br />the adoption of a modified tax increment financing plan. <br /> <br />Waldron summarized the amendment and alternative actions which <br />the city could take. <br /> <br />Maschka moved and DeBenedet seconded to table consideration of <br />this matter for 60 days. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Berry, Goedeke, Stokes, Maschka, <br />Moeller, DeBenedet, Johnson <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planning File 1984 <br /> <br />Robert Monson request for a lot division at 2774 Lakeview Avenue. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the proposed division and its location and <br />right of way needs. <br /> <br />Maschka questioned the location of the easement and what <br />determined the location of the new property line. <br /> <br />Monson stated that the location of the new property line was made <br />because of tree location and for visual and aesthetic reasons. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned whether the location of the line coincided <br />