Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pagel 3 <br /> <br />Wednesday, October 12, 1988 <br /> <br />to the fire station impact question and what has been provided <br />seems to be contrary to information form the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Maschka asked a question concerning the costs and <br />participation in this project. Waldron summarized the <br />increment financing numbers. <br /> <br />City <br />tax <br /> <br />Dick Ferletti, District Fire Chief, of the Dale street station <br />stated that the proj ect will have an effect on response time <br />especially with volunteers getting to the station. <br /> <br />John Rohdy, 494 Grandview Avenue, questioned the cost of looping <br />water lines in the area. Keel responded by stating that the <br />looping costs would be born by the developer and not the city. <br /> <br />Rohdy asked what the potential water tower costs would be. Keel <br />outlined the various solutions and costs for dealing with the <br />water pressure problems in the area. <br /> <br />Rohdy questioned the timing of the looping of the water lines and <br />asked what water pressure problems would the residents on the <br />third story of the apartments have. Keel responded that the <br />looping would be done with the development and that the third <br />story residents would not suffer any worse pressure problems than <br />others in the area. <br /> <br />Geof Kaufmann, 2408 Cohansey street, stated his concern that the <br />traffic study was inaccurate because it was done during the <br />summer when traffic levels are low. Wilson responded that <br />Barton-Aschman had looked at traffic historically and that they <br />believed that July was a high month. <br /> <br />Kaufmann stated concerns that the effects of the proposal on the <br />adj acent Elementary School have not been adequately addressed <br />including the effect on children walking to school, bus traffic, <br />and on drop off traffic. Kaufmann also stated concerns about the <br />extension of tax increment financing district #10. Kaufmann <br />asked if properties in the district are contiguous or <br />noncontiguous. Waldron summarized the proposed extension of Tax <br />Increment District #10 and pointed out that the properties are <br />noncontiguous which meets the legislative requirements. <br /> <br />Kaufmann asked where the properties are located and what portion <br />of the city they comprise. Waldron summarized the parcels, <br />buildings and conditions of buildings within Tax Increment <br />District #10. Waldron stated that it would be a small proportion <br />of the land area of the City. <br />