My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_881207
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1988
>
pm_881207
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:32:59 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:38:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/7/1988
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page# 2 <br /> <br />Wednesday, December 7, 1988 <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />stokes, Moeller, DeBenedet, <br />Goedeke, Johnson <br /> <br />Berry, <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />Planninq File 1909 <br /> <br />Bradford Schools request for a comprehensive plan change from <br />high density residential to limited business, rezoning from R-3A <br />to B-1 and approval of a special use permit for a planned unit <br />development. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the location and past actions concerning the <br />proposed site. Dahlgren outlined the proposal and the proposed <br />phasing. <br /> <br />Keel summarized the City's utilities and traffic concerns. <br /> <br />Chris Seigle testified that Bradford Schools insists upon high <br />quality in its faculty, students, curriculum and facilities. <br />Seigle summarized Bradford School's site selection criteria and <br />why this site is good for them. <br /> <br />Ron Erickson gave an overview of the previous and current <br />proposals. <br /> <br />Stokes inquired if high school traffic had been taken into <br />account in the traffic studies. Erickson indicated that the <br />traffic count numbers were actual counts which would include the <br />high school traffic. Erik Ruehr stated that his firm counted <br />traffic from 1-3 p.m. which included the 2-2:30 peak traffic from <br />the high school. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned the style of the town houses and the <br />location of mechanical equipment. Erickson replied that there <br />would be a combination of gable and hip roofs and that there <br />would be no mechanical equipment on the roof or outside the <br />structure except for transformers. <br /> <br />Berry asked if the units would be handicap accessible. Erickson <br />replied that one unit would be designed for handicapped. Berry <br />questioned what signage would be installed on the site. Erickson <br />responded that the signage had not been designed yet but they <br />would work within the City's regulations. <br /> <br />Berry asked what types of trees are being provided and whether or <br />not they would strain the development. Erickson summarized the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.