pm_890405 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page# 7 Wednesday, April 5, 1989 gone and maybe needed. of this proposal. stokes added that he can't vote in favor Goedeke inquired what the width of the utility easement would be and if this could be used for pedestrian access. Keel stated that the width is not known approximately 30 feet and that the easement easement not a pedestrian easement. Dahlgren could maintain a pedestrian easement also. but it would be would be a utility added that the city Johnson stated she couldn't support maintaining title to the right-of-way because C2 is no longer needed for east-west access. Goedeke asked what the applicants reaction to the possibility of providing a pedestrian easement would be. A representative from Rosedale Chevrolet stated that there is nothing firm to react to. The Rosedale Chevrolet representative added that this proposal was a common sense way to get the property on tax roles and also to meet their needs. DeBenedet moved and Maschka seconded to recommend City Council approval of the vacation of the portion of County Road C2 lying between Long Lake Road and 35W with the following conditions: 1. That the appropriate utility easements be provided subject to staff review and approval. 2. That the required deferred assessments be paid. 3. That concrete perimeter curbing around the existing and proposed parking areas be provided as required by City code. 4. That a storm drain be provided subject to staff review and approval. 5. That concrete curb and gutter be provided on Long Lake Road. 6. That trash enclosures be provided for dumpsters subject to staff review and approval. 7. That the landscape plan be subj ect to staff review and approval. stokes asked if the makers of the motion would consider adding a requirement for a pedestrian easement.