My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_890503
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1989
>
pm_890503
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:04 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:38:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
5/3/1989
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget 2 <br /> <br />Wednesday, May 3, 1989 <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the location of the site and the proposed lot <br />division. <br /> <br />Paul Kysylyczyn appeared to answer questions concerning his <br />request. <br /> <br />No citizens appeared to testify on the matter. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Maschka seconded to recommend approval of the <br />proposed lot division at 3083 victoria street with the following <br />conditions: <br /> <br />1. That 10 feet of right of way be dedicated along victoria <br />Street. <br />2. That all required assessments be paid. <br />3. That a grading plan be submitted for staff approval along <br />with a building permit application. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Berry, Goedeke, Maschka, DeBenedet, <br />Stokes, Johnson <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq 1924 <br /> <br />Lorraine st. Louis request for lot division at 2185 st. Croix <br />Street. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the location and the proposed lot division. <br /> <br />Keel pointed out that sanitary sewers stubs were in place, that <br />there would be assessments due, and that the final drainage plan <br />would need to be reviewed at the time that a building permit is <br />applied for. <br /> <br />James Greenstein, an attorney representing the applicant, <br />appeared to answer any questions and apologize for not being <br />present at the previous month meeting. Greenstein stated that he <br />had no notice of the previous meeting date. <br /> <br />No citizens appeared concerning this matter. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.