Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page' 4 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 5, 1989 <br /> <br />detention pond being proposed would be sized to meet current <br />standards. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned safety precautions for employees and water <br />availability. Hale responded that there were extinguishers and <br />that the building was sprinklered and that a six inch water main <br />is provided. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned the soils in the pond and the outlet design. <br />Hale stated that the natural soil is clay. Wille explained the <br />outlet design of the holding pond. <br /> <br />Maschka questioned what security provisions were present. Hale <br />replied that presently there is security on the site ten hours a <br />day and that there would be security on the site 16 hours a day <br />when the molecular sieve is in operation. <br /> <br />Maschka questioned the possibility of vandalism. Heitzer <br />responded that the design of the truck is such that there is a <br />safety mechanism which would prevent somebody from randomly <br />opening a valve and spilling the contents of a truck. <br /> <br />Berry stated that the City needs to be persistent in these <br />matters because things have been missed in the past. Berry <br />questioned if the design of the two containment areas were the <br />same. Heitzer responded that the design is the same but the <br />dimensions are different. <br /> <br />Berry asked if the existing spill containment is to remain as is. <br />Heitzer responded that there are no plans to change the design <br />and that changes will be made as new regulations are presented. <br /> <br />Berry stated her concern about the proposed time line. Berry <br />added that the time line should be part of the staff review and <br />documented so that progress can be tracked. Berry questioned the <br />mechanism for retrieving a spill on the existing area. Hale <br />responded that the spill would drain into the containment in the <br />existing tank farm and recovered. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned why the applicant was reluctant to redo the <br />driveway. Hale responded that the driveway is in good condition, <br />and that they don't want to tear it up until the City does Rose <br />Place or until the driveway needs upgrading. Keel stated that <br />the design of Rose Place and cuI de sac has not been done yet but <br />that they could match into the curb of the driveway if one is <br />constructed. <br /> <br />Johnson pointed out that the applicant is not being treated <br />