My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_890705
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
198x
>
1989
>
pm_890705
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:04 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:38:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/5/1989
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page' 7 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 5, 1989 <br /> <br />Dahlgren summarized the location and the previous and current <br />proposals. Dahlgren pointed out that there has been a <br />cooperative effort to achieve the current design. <br /> <br />Keel stated that Public Works Department concerns have been <br />addressed. <br /> <br />Daniel Commers stated that he was excited about the plan and that <br />it should work for everyone involved. <br /> <br />Juris Curiskis, the architect working on the project, appeared to <br />answer questions. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned the roof top screening. Curiskis stated <br />that metal screening painted to match the trim was a possibility. <br />Commers stated that because of the new roofing system that had <br />been applied that it would tough to put a fence around the units. <br />Commers stated that he would prefer to paint the units instead. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned the circulation around the site and wondered <br />if the one way circulation could be reversed. <br /> <br />curiskis stated that the proposed circulation works and provides <br />better aesthetics. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned if there was sufficient distance to allow <br />the 180 degree turn to leave the site. Curiskis responded that <br />sufficient distance is available. Goedeke pointed out that at <br />the previous Commission meeting, there was discussion of future <br />equipment in the front area and he questioned if there was enough <br />area in the present plan to allow that. Michael Sanchelli stated <br />that they gained approximately 2400 sq. feet of new space in the <br />new plan, while he didn't know the exact needs, he stated he felt <br />there should be sufficient area. <br /> <br />Johnson stated for the record that Commissioner stokes would be <br />abstaining from this matter because he had conducted appraisal <br />work on the site. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned whether tax increment financing would be used. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the tax increment financing issue would be <br />resolved by the Council and that the role of the Planning <br />Commission would be to deal with design and land use. <br /> <br />Berry moved and Maschka seconded to recommend approval of <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.