Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page#14 <br /> <br />Wednesday, December 6, 1989 <br /> <br />1. That the city could review contractor's licenses and send <br />out letters. <br /> <br />2. Get through the design standards review and use that as a <br />reason to send out letters reminding contractor's of city <br />requirements including permits. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that it sounded reasonable. <br /> <br />Discussion concerning future development of Concordia School <br />site. <br /> <br />Waldron introduced the subject by pointing out that the Concordia <br />Academy wants to stay on the site but they want to sell off a 10 <br />acre site along the east side of the property. Waldron stated <br />this matter has been referred to the Planning commission so that <br />a discussion could occur about what might work on the site and to <br />provide input to the Council to establish some parameters to <br />guide a future development on the ten acres. Waldron pointed out <br />that as an example, the ordinance would allow 26-35 single family <br />dwellings, 60 duplex units or 100 quad units on the 10 acre site. <br />Waldron also asked for input on the Planning Commission on <br />whether or not the City should negotiate to have joint use on the <br />site for such things as ball fields. <br /> <br />Stokes stated that past experience would seem to dictate that <br />redevelopment has to be single family. <br /> <br />Johnson agreed that single family use is what the city heard over <br />and over again. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that it should be the city's goal to preserve as <br />much R-l land as possible because of the short supply of single <br />family lots. DeBenedet also stated that the city has a housing <br />policy to promote alternative styles of housing and that he <br />thought the Z-lot concept had potential on that site. DeBenedet <br />also pointed out that something should be done to isolate future <br />residential development from the noise, and air pollution <br />problems presented by Highway 36. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the issue of noise on <br />have to be dealt with because it would <br />development in the City along Highway 36. <br /> <br />Highway 36 may not <br />be consistent with <br /> <br />Berry stated that Highway noise is increasing and needs to be <br />addressed and that non-standard approaches need to be explored. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the neighborhood appears to be willing to <br />