pm_891206 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page#16 Wednesday, December 6, 1989 individual, he would be concerned about the amount of traffic going through the neighborhood if connected. Johnson Waldron brought develop questioned what the next step in this process would be. responded that he anticipated that the matter would be before the Council at a work session next month to parameters to react to future development proposals. Johnson stated she would be glad to appear before the Council on this matter. Discussion concerning parking and sign setback issues. DeBenedet suggested that the city should look at parking lot and sign setback requirements. DeBenedet asked what would be the problem with letting property owners locate signs closer to the right-of-way vs. larger signs further away. DeBenedet asked if the City should be reviewing these issues. DeBenedet moved, Berry seconded to recommend that the staff study the issue of parking lot, sign size and setback requirements. Berry pointed out the problems with locating buildings in certain areas of the City because they don't have proper address numbers on them. DeBenedet brought to the Commission's attention a article he read pointing out that people can sue municipal officials if handicap code requirement are not enforced. Berry stated that handicap code is not well enforced and pointed out that there are constant problems with misuse of handicap spaces. Goedeke asked for the status of the unsafe structure which he pointed out to staff at the previous Planning commission meeting. Jopke responded that staff has looked at the structure and is working with the owner to bring it up to code or to have it removed. Berry asked if the attorney objecting to the easement vacation on Belair circle at the previous Planning Commission meeting was informed of the Planning Commissions action as requested by the Commission. Jopke responded that Mr. Keel has responded to the attorney. Adjournment