pm_891206 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION page# 9 Wednesday, December 6, 1989 LeTendre replied that most of the trash storage would be inside the building. Johnson asked if the applicant would be agreeable to a condition which would require internal trash storage except for the one area shown on the plan. Goedeke asked if the back was brick or painted block. Curiskis stated that the distraction is not the block material but is the power lines, meters and conduits on the back of the building and it is not possible to eliminate them. Goedeke pointed out that the existing Liebermann sign is a problem. curiskis stated that there would be sign criteria for the building which would require individual letters on the facia. LeTendre stated that there would limits on size height and design on the leases. Johnson questioned if the applicant owned the adjacent building to the west. LeTendre stated that they did not own it. curiskis stated that the trash enclosure needs is a function of how often trash is picked up. Johnson replied that internal trash storage is the real answer. LeTendre replied that screening the full building height is not economically possible and added that it is a 20 year old building that cannot be made to look like a Loehmann's Plaza. Johnson pointed out that painting may be the best solution. DeBenedet stated that the number of handicap spaces did not appear to be adequate. LeTendre replied that they could put five in front of the building. Goedeke questioned the usability of the parking stalls on the west side of the building. LeTendre replied that Schneiderman's requires just one loading dock. Goedeke asked the location of the Schneiderman's loading dock and pointed out that if they had five tenants, five loading docks would be required which would eliminate alot of parking spaces. Curiskis replied that there would be employee parking on the west side of the building and that delivery times are known and can be controlled and should not interfere with parking.