Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page# 8 <br /> <br />Wednesday, December 6, 1989 <br /> <br />Curiskis replied that there would be six tenants and each would <br />have a separate entrance. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned how the entrances would be provided once the <br />building was constructed as proposed. <br /> <br />curiskis repl ied that it is an open canopy and the entrances <br />which could be altered as necessary to provide entrances. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned who would be using the parking on the west <br />side and asked if the loading docks were going to stay. Curiskis <br />answered that there would be employee parking and that some <br />loading docks would be closed and locked up. Curiskis added that <br />there would be a loading dock for the proposed Schneiderman's <br />Furniture store. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked what the design of the canopy was and pointed out <br />his concern about viewing the back of the canopy. Curiskis <br />stated that they would be open and that there could be structural <br />problems if it were solid. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if there was any way to cover the back. Curiskis <br />stated that it would only a small part of the back of the canopy <br />visible. LeTendre stated that you couldn't see the back of the <br />canopy because of the depth of the building. DeBenedet added <br />that they were trying to convert a 20 year old warehouse building <br />and that because of the depth of the building, there would not be <br />small tenants in the building. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that users can change and that there was no way <br />for the city to come back to correct problems with centers once a <br />variance has been granted. <br /> <br />LeTendre stated that this proposal was an interim use and that <br />they would anticipate redevelopment at a future date. <br /> <br />curiskis stated that the building is twice as deep as normal <br />strip centers which would eliminate ordinary tenants. Curiskis <br />stated that the type of building is conducive to furniture type <br />users which don't have the same parking needs as smaller tenants. <br /> <br />Berry questioned the finish on the rear of the building and <br />pointed out that this is what a large amount of people will see. <br />Curiskis replied that the back would be painted block. <br /> <br />Berry questioned how trash would be handled and asked if it would <br />be internal or just a small enclosure shown on the plan. <br />