My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900207
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900207
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:09 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
2/7/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page:f/: 5 <br /> <br />Wednesday, February 7, 1990 <br /> <br />Dahlgren stated that in the past, the policy has been to approve <br />the lot divisions if they are in scale with surrounding lots. <br /> <br />DeBenedet suggested that the Commission amend the motion to state <br />that neither of the lots be less than 11,000 sq. feet. He <br />commented that the rights of the surrounding neighbors are <br />protected by the zoning ordinance. He also stated that the staff <br />found no reason to deny the request and stated that he favors <br />this lot division. <br /> <br />wietecki commented that it was not clear if they were taking away <br />the right of privacy of the surrounding neighbors. <br /> <br />Dahlgren stated that lots having double frontage have a great <br />potential for division. He also stated that the lots would be <br />135 feet long with substantial room behind the house. <br /> <br />wietecki stated that there is the potential of limiting rights <br />and the neighbors use of their properties. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned how to balance those rights. DeBenedet <br />stated that municipalities have to obey their own laws and rely <br />on the zoning code. <br /> <br />Johnson added that they must follow the ordinances of the city. <br /> <br />wietecki questioned whether the City should be asking the <br />developer to pay for a portion of street costs. Keel outlined <br />the cities assessment policy as it relates to double fronting <br />lots. <br /> <br />Berry stated that this is what the City has been asking for in <br />terms of new lots. <br /> <br />Berry moved and DeBenedet seconded to recommend approval of <br />Thomas and Mary Short's request for division of a platted lot at <br />990 W. County Road B with the following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That dedication of right-of-way occur as proposed for County <br />Road B and Burke Avenue (total of 40 feet) prior to filing <br />of deed. <br /> <br />2. That payment of required additional assessments be made. <br />3. That staff approve drainage and utilities plans. <br /> <br />4. That the lots are a minimum of 11,000 sq. feet. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Goedeke, Stokes, Berry, <br />Johnson <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.