pm_900221 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Pagel 4 Wednesday, February 21, 1990 Goedeke questioned if it was the surface area of the bottom only that is counted. DeBenedet stated that there is no way to face retaining walls on reinforced concrete. Dahlgren suggested that perhaps we could adjust the language to read drywall retaining walls. Goedeke commented on the large amount of surface area parking for apartments. Dahlgren stated that underground parking is encouraged by giving the developer a land credit of 300 square feet for every car parked underground. Required that if garages are built outside, they need to supply enough room in the foreground of the garage to park a car and not block traffic. Johnson questioned if satellite dishes are included as rooftop equipment. Johnson added that NSP on 35W has a huge dish on the rooftop. Johnson questioned how these dishes are dealt with in the design standards. wietecki stated that these are difficult to screen. Dahlgren commented on the way it is currently handled. He stated that any aerials represent an aesthetic problem and is referred to the City Council. Johnson questioned whether they could be situated on the ground. Dahlgren replied that they may be situated on the ground. Johnson expressed a concern for the growing interest in satellite dishes. wietecki suggested that these be included in site plan reviews. DeBenedet stated that satellite dishes should be classified under rooftop equipment. Keel commented that often permits are not taken for these satellite dishes. Wietecki suggested that 1ahe wording be adjusted to include all types of rooftop equipment. Berry suggested that the staff find out what other communi ties have done.