pm_900221 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION Pagel 5 Wednesday, February 21, 1990 Goedeke questioned if the size of the dish could be controlled. Berry suggested that additional information is needed on this subject. Johnson stated that more information must be found on this matter in order to make a decision. Berry questioned if irrigation in the landscaping is addressed. Dahlgren stated that alot of the better developments are putting in irrigation. Dahlgren added that some ci ties now require developers to install irrigation and it is quite cheap when put in at the time of development. Berry added that she feels irrigation should be required. wietecki commented that some developments should be required to install irrigation while others should not. wietecki added that an option to the installation of irrigation would be to pose a maintenance plan, such as a grounds keeper. Wietecki stated that we should encourage irrigation but not require it. Berry complained of the noise from the A+ plant. Berry commented that it goes beyond the boundaries. Berry added that a new language should be looked at by the City Attorney. Cushman stated that there doesn't seem to be a lot of confidence in what you can do concerning noise but the PCA standards are usually the only thing that holds up in court. Dahlgren stated that noise is hard to address. violates this with its freeways. The government Johnson stated that the Planning Commission should have a joint meeting with the City Council. Dahlgren reviewed policies to establish a threshold. A. site Plan Review B. Concrete curbing and drainage. Keel stated that non-conforming uses can be contained. Keel stated that he would follow item 2 that read: new parking lot surfacing shall be a minimum of 2 inches of bituminous pavement. A parking lot expansion of 10% of more (surface area) will trigger conformance to design standards for the entire lot.