Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Pagel 6 <br /> <br />Wednesday, February 21, 1990 <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that he agrees with option 2 and feels that <br />option 1 lets too many people through. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the members of the Planning Commission favor <br />item 2. <br /> <br />Dahlgren reviewed <br />the building code <br />discussed with Mr. <br />Dahlgren added that <br />be a fire hazard. <br />from Mr. Mooney. <br /> <br />right-of-way dedication. Dahlgren explained <br />items. Dahlgren state that this section was <br />Mooney. A write up was made by Mr. Mooney. <br />needing a key to get out of a building could <br />Dahlgren suggests a request for a follow up <br /> <br />Dahlgren reviewed requirements and problems of enforcement of <br />handicap access. <br /> <br />Johnson suggested that there be a further report on <br />interpretation. <br /> <br />Dahlgren stated that the language gives a back up of what is <br />required. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the problem of interpretation must be <br />alleviated. <br /> <br />Dahlgren commented about monument signs and where they may be <br />built. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the interpretation of the language of the <br />sign ordinance is very crucial so the inspectors can go out and <br />talk to people about what can and cannot be done. <br /> <br />Berry stated that temporary signs seem to be left in place for <br />extended periods of time. <br /> <br />Johnson commented that more time should be spent on the sign <br />ordinance. The Planning commission and the Community Development <br />Department should meet together on this item. <br /> <br />Johnson commented that she has no information at this time, but <br />was recently informed that the little league is interested in <br />possible advertising around the fields. <br /> <br />Ad;ournment <br /> <br />There being no further business, the meeting adj ourned at 9: 00 <br />p.m. <br />