Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page4/:11 <br /> <br />Wednesday, March 7, 1990 <br /> <br />Johnson stated that the Planning commission cannot <br />guarantees. Johnson stated that areas of concerns <br />defined for the applicant to think about. <br /> <br />give any <br />have been <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that it would be inappropriate for the Planning <br />commission to vote on this because the dedication has not <br />happened. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that the city does not have that piece of paper <br />that says the City may proceed with this matter. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned why this right-of-way dedication was not <br />filed. DeBenedet stated that this should be tabled to allow time <br />for review of these new suggestions. <br /> <br />Johnson closed the public hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Berry seconded to continue for 30 days to <br />enable applicant to get the dedication in writing and go over new <br />ideas for the site plan. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned if the residents of the apartment building are <br />aware of this proposal. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />DeBenedet, Stokes, Goedeke, Berry, <br />Johnson <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />other Business <br /> <br />Johnson stated that a public hearing date should be set in April <br />for the design standards. The Planning Commission must also set <br />a date to meet with the city council. <br /> <br />Adiournment <br /> <br />There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 9: 45 p.m. <br />