My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900418
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900418
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:18 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
4/18/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Paget 3 <br /> <br />Wednesday, April 18, 1990 <br /> <br />on it and throwing things at it. Dunn stated that there is a row <br />of parking front of this wall. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned if the ramp to the top level is designed to <br />allow a fire truck to go on it. Dunn commented that the ramp <br />could handle a fire truck. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned what the parking configuration is for the top <br />of the ramp. Sloat stated that the parking configuration will <br />match what is on the lower level and reviewed the parking <br />drawing for the Planning commission. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned what the lighting would be like and how long <br />the ramp will be open. Johnson stated that the lighting <br />description is included in the packet. <br /> <br />wietecki questioned the location of the fence and if the easement <br />is very restrictive. Dunn replied that the easement is very <br />restrictive. <br /> <br />John Busse, 2571 Wheeler, questioned if the height of the fence <br />will be strictly 10 feet across and flat on the top. Busse also <br />questioned why the ramp needs to be open all night. Dunn replied <br />that the fence will follow the contours of the land and may be 8 <br />feet in some spots to the east. Dunn added that the sight line <br />studies done here show that this 8 feet will shield residents <br />from the loading dock, the bottom of the ramp, and truck traffic. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned if it would look better to have the fence the <br />same height all the way across. Dunn stated that it could be <br />considered. <br /> <br />Dunn stated that the ramp will likely be used 24 hours a day if <br />kept open. <br /> <br />Jon Schmittdiel, 1694 Oakcrest Avenue, stated that he is <br />concerned about accuracy of the sight lines. Schmittdiel <br />questioned what happens if a 10 foot fence isn't high enough. <br />Schmittdiel questioned if there will be an exit to the ramp on <br />the north side. He also stated a concern about the exact <br />location of the fence. Dunn stated that there will be a lower <br />level exit on the north side of the ramp. Dunn stated that in <br />dealing with the fence location, Welsh can encroach up to 2 feet <br />from the south property line. Dunn added that their easement is <br />50 feet from the property line and he does not know how flexible <br />this could be. <br /> <br />Jopke stated that he called Williams Pipeline and talked to <br />their legal staff in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Jopke added that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.