My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900606
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900606
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:23 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
6/6/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />page#15 <br /> <br />Wednesday, June 6, 1990 <br /> <br />Joyce Nordquist said that they are addressing the soil <br />contamination problem and that they were aware of utility <br />concerns. Nordquist summarized the type of housing and the <br />income requirements for people purchasing the proposed six new <br />homes. <br /> <br />Janice Kahn pointed out that there are no valuable trees on the <br />site. <br /> <br />stokes questioned if the land had been purchased yet. Kahn <br />responded that the property is being purchased by a holding <br />company and it is no longer owned by Trapp. <br /> <br />stokes asked who would be obligated for any damages for down <br />zoning the property. Kahn stated that there was no damage. <br /> <br />Jopke pointed out that there is a grant being used to write down <br />the land. <br /> <br />Shardlow stated that there should be no damages because the <br />applicant is requesting the down zoning. <br /> <br />DeBenedet asked if the applicant had read the staff report and <br />understood it. Nordquist responded that she understood the <br />issues. <br /> <br />An unknown resident questioned what the down zoning was. Johnson <br />responded that that would be rezoning the property from B-3 to R- <br />1. <br /> <br />Harry McKensie, 2501 W. County Road C-2, pointed out that the <br />triangle of his land which is included in the plat has not been <br />acquired yet and stated that the ponding area proposed is not a <br />good idea. <br /> <br />Keel responded that the drainage area eventually goes to County <br />Road C-2 and that it is not a wet pond. Keel added that the <br />design is subject to further detailed review. <br /> <br />McKensie asked what affect the proposal had on drainage of his <br />property. Keel stated that it doesn't appear that it will <br />affect Mr. McKensie's property but that the detailed design will <br />have to be reviewed when building permits are issued. <br /> <br />Kahn explained the legal requirements and restrictions of <br />ownership because of the grant requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.