My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900711
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:26 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/11/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 11, 1990 <br /> <br />storage. <br /> <br />Berry commented that the shed would not be rolled back into the <br />building at night. Jopke stated that a shed was not much <br />different than an ice cooler. DeBenedet stated that coolers are <br />not a structure. <br /> <br />Hasek stated that this could be approved based on it being open <br />storage with a clarification that another approval is needed for <br />a shed building permit. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />Berry moved and DeBenedet seconded the motion to recommend the <br />special use permit for outside storage and merchandising with the <br />following conditions: <br /> <br />1. That any new structure has to come back for city approval. <br />2. That merchandise carts only be displayed during business <br />hours. <br />3. That the display locations are marked on the sidewalk. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Berry, DeBenedet, Johnson, Roberts, <br />Stokes, wietecki <br /> <br />Nayes: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />Planninq File 2113 <br /> <br />Hugh Maynard request for a sideyard setback variance and a <br />shoreline setback variance at 2750 victoria street. This <br />variance is being requested for the Rosewood Estates project on <br />victoria street. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Hasek summarized the site location and why a variance was needed. <br />Hasek stated that the encroachment was not significant. Hasek <br />said that the building was 3.6 feet too close to the shoreline <br />as measured from the ordinary high water mark. <br /> <br />Roberts questioned whether they were defining wetlands as <br />highwater. Hasek stated that they were but that what was called <br />for in the ordinance was the ordinary high water mark. <br /> <br />Jopke stated that the ordinary highwater mark was where the <br />vegetation changes from wetland vegetation to dryland vegetation <br />and that structures must a minimum of 75 feet from this mark. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.