My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900711
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900711
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:26 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
7/11/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />Wednesday, July 11, 1990 <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned how wide the catwalk was. Conway stated <br />that it was 3 feet but was not used by pedestrians. <br /> <br />DeBenedet commented on the look of the shed. <br />it would be a wood structure that was stained. <br />photographs of a similar type shed. <br /> <br />Conway stated that <br />Conway passed out <br /> <br />stokes commented on the need for curb cuts for the handicapped. <br />Conway stated that because they pump gas for handicapped, there <br />is no need for the handicapped to leave their car. <br /> <br />stokes questioned whether there were curb cuts for bathroom <br />access. Conway stated that currently the bathrooms aren't <br />handicapped accessible but that they would consider changing the <br />bathrooms. <br /> <br />Johnson commented on the need for the display area to be marked <br />off. Conway stated that the displays are put in the same exact <br />place every day. <br /> <br />wietecki questioned whether the shed would fall under the <br />ordinance that accessory buildings be consistent with other <br />structures on the site. He commented that the shed should look <br />like the rest of the store. <br /> <br />Johnson commented that this would be looked at during the <br />building permit process. <br /> <br />DeBenedet questioned whether there were any plans <br />reconstruction of the building. Conway stated that there <br />none. DeBenedet questioned what the age of the building <br />Conway stated that it was approximately 20 years old. <br /> <br />for <br />were <br />was. <br /> <br />The Public Hearing was closed. <br /> <br />DeBenedet commented that staff should look consistently at <br />pedestrian traffic at service stations. He questioned whether <br />these cat walks were for people or were they there to stop cars <br />from going through the building. DeBenedet also stated that he <br />was concerned about the shed. <br /> <br />Johnson stated that they should separate the outside storage <br />special use permit from the shed approval. DeBenedet questioned <br />whether a gas station required a special use permit. Jopke <br />stated that it did. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that they should look closer at the shed. <br />Johnson stated that Clark has plenty of room for a shed. Johnson <br />said that the city isn't approving a building, only outdoor <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.