My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
pm_900801
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
199x
>
1990
>
pm_900801
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 3:33:29 PM
Creation date
12/15/2004 7:55:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Planning Commission
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
8/1/1990
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />Wednesday, August 1, 1990 <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />Berry moved and wietecki seconded approval of the lot split with <br />the following conditions: 1) That ten feet of additional right- <br />of-way be dedicated along victoria street; 2) That all <br />assessments be paid; 3) That an additional sanitary sewer service <br />be installed for the new lot. <br /> <br />Roll Call: <br /> <br />Ayes: <br /> <br />Berry, DeBenedet, Goedeke, Johnson, <br />Roberts, Stokes, wietecki <br /> <br />Nays: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />PlanninQ File 2136 <br /> <br />Donald Roberts request for a lot division at 222 W. McCarrons <br />Boulevard. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Shardlow summarized the lot division and stated that the proposed <br />lot was very large and was well in excess of the minimum <br />requirements for a lot. Shardlow stated that the proposed lot <br />conforms in all ways. <br /> <br />Keel stated that the frontage on McCarron's Street is not <br />desirable but since it is a lightly travelled road it should not <br />present any problems. Keel added that the lot will need a sewer <br />hook up and that there are no outstanding assessments. <br /> <br />Johnson questioned whether the 75 foot shoreline setback would be <br />a problem. Keel stated that it is a big parcel and that there <br />is plenty of room to properly place a house on the lot. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned whether the placement of a driveway will <br />impact sewer lines. Keel stated that driveways can be built on <br />sewer lines but structures cannot. <br /> <br />Roger Hess, 1913 Shady Beach, stated that he was concerned that <br />the road ends right at the lot line, therefore a driveway would <br />go right through his yard. Keel stated that there is a right-of- <br />way to the lot. Keel added that Hess has maintained it but that <br />it is still a public right-of-way. <br /> <br />Hess testified that he wants to make sure that the driveways are <br />constructed for each others benefit. Keel stated that when the <br />building permit is issued they will look at that issue. <br /> <br />Roger Lundquist, 211 McCarrons st., also stated his concern <br />about the location of the driveway. Lundquist added that the <br />proposed home would cut off his view of the lake. Lundquist <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.