Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />Wednesday, August 1, 1990 <br /> <br />stated that he is opposed to the lot split. <br /> <br />Harold Dworshak, 201 McCarrons st., questioned whether the fire <br />hydrant would have to be moved. Keel stated that it depends on <br />the survey. Keel stated that the lot has frontage on McCarron's <br />street so it has a right to access it. Keel stated that when the <br />building permit is submitted they will be able to take a better <br />look at where the driveway will be located. <br /> <br />Hess stated that a 100 year oak would probably have to be <br />removed. DeBenedet stated that with a 110 foot frontage it <br />should be easy to locate a driveway that doesn't destroy any <br />trees. <br /> <br />Keel stated that they will attempt to put the street where there <br />is a minimum amount of damage to the surrounding area. Hess <br />stated that he hoped that when they did change the road he hoped <br />it was done right. Hess stated he wasn't opposed to the lot <br />split. <br /> <br />Shardlow stated that the question was whether the lot split is <br />consistent with city ordinances. Shardlow stated that they <br />cannot deny the split if the proposal meets City requirements. <br />Johnson stated that was good advice. <br /> <br />Keel stated that as part of the pavement management program. <br />This area would be improved in about four years. Hess stated to <br />make sure the road doesn't encroach on the property. <br /> <br />Goedeke stated that other neighbors would have to agree to move <br />the road before it would be done. Goedeke stated that the <br />neighbors input would be solicited. Hess stated that the road <br />will have to be moved in order for it to look good. Johnson <br />stated that they will be notified before the road would be moved. <br /> <br />Anderson questioned why the proposed lot couldn't get access from <br />McCarron's Blvd. Johnson stated that since the proposed lot has <br />110 feet of frontage on McCarron's street, they cannot deny that <br />access. Keel stated that the details will have to be worked out <br />as part of the building permit process. <br /> <br />The Public Hearing was closed. <br /> <br />MOTION <br /> <br />DeBenedet moved and Berry seconded to recommend approval of the <br />lot split with the following conditions. 1) the fence be <br />removed by October 15, 1990; 2) that driveway access, shoreline <br />setback, and erosion control be reviewed in conjunction with the <br />issuance of a building permit for the construction of the new <br />house on Tract B. <br />