Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ROSEVILLE PLANNING COMMISSION <br /> <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />Wednesday, August 1, 1990 <br /> <br />Planninq File 2113 <br /> <br />Hugh Maynard request for a sideyard setback variance and a <br />shoreline setback variance at 2750 Victoria Street. This <br />variance is being requested for the Rosewood Estates project on <br />victoria Street. <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Shardlow summarized the site and stated that there were two <br />questions that needed to be answered. The first was what is the <br />proper line to use to measure the shoreline setback and the <br />second is how did the encroachment happen. Shardlow stated that <br />staff visited the site and determined that the October 1998 line <br />surveyed is the proper line to use. Thus the shoreline <br />encroachment is 3.6 feet and the sideyard encroachment is .7 <br />feet. Shardlow stated that this happened because the architect <br />put the street center line on the right of way line, thus <br />thinking he had plenty of room for the building. <br /> <br />Hugh Maynard representing the Rosewood Estates stated that <br />Shardlow explained accurately the proper line to use and that <br />they were indeed encroaching the shoreline setback by 3.6 feet. <br />Maynard explained that in the process of developing the site a <br />new surveyor was hired, thus a new site plan was drawn up. When <br />the architect overlayed the two surveys he incorrectly placed the <br />street centerline on the right of way line. Maynard stated that <br />had this been discovered earlier they would have remedied the <br />mistake. <br /> <br />Goedeke questioned whether the high amount of rain the area has <br />experienced this year would cause the lake to be higher. Keel <br />stated that the lake is slightly higher. Keel stated that there <br />was a control on the lake to regulate it's height but that higher <br />lake levels wouldn't change the location of the aquatic <br />vegetation. <br /> <br />DeBenedet stated that he wanted to see the overheads again to see <br />how the mistake came about. Maynard presented the overheads and <br />demonstrated how the overlays were incorrectly aligned. <br /> <br />wietecki questioned what level the control on the lake was set <br />at. Keel stated that it was below the 100 year highwater mark. <br /> <br />Wietecki questioned what plants staff looked at to determine <br />change in vegetation. Keel stated that there were reedy-type <br />grasses and other swampy vegetation. wietecki questioned whether <br />10 people could come up with different lines marking the change <br />in vegetation. Keel stated yes. <br />